ShadeDev

About

Username
ShadeDev
Joined
Visits
5,076
Last Active
Roles
Member, Robot Entertainment, Early Access, Apprentice Founder, Featured Developer
Points
1,191
Badges
9
  • Re: Feedback on update 2.6 custom games

    You should not be losing sabotage consumables in custom games.
  • Re: Release 2.6 for PC and PS4 - Patch Notes

    liels said:
    Harmonia said:

    Ceiling Ballista and Dragon Lance:

    • Damage increased by 20%.
    • Cooldown increased by 20%.
      Developer Comment: This change is designed to further accentuate the ballista's role as a large minion killer.

    Forward:  I think most of the changes this time are positive, as they are most times.  What I have a problem with are map and trap changes that seem akin to:

    "players like these and they work really well, and other traps (or cading strategies) the balance team things are really good are being neglected, so let's move the cheese to see if players will do different things".

    Robot tries really hard not to take away rewards that people have earned, and does so reluctantly.  I submit the time spent learning or discovering good strategies (that then propagate) are a thing that the balance team does not seem to value and takes away whimsically.  After each round of balancing, some strategies will be better than others.  Players will learn, the balance team apprehends an over or undervaluing of things being done and adjusts.  And then the players adjust.  Are we fighting orcs or the balance team?

    As an OMD1/2 and U player (since the beginning of open beta) I was not aware that traps had intended roles.  Certainly traps such as brimstone are more effective at earthlings than e.g. tar but I will place a ballista near the rift to catch those stragglers.  Is that wrong?  Apparently I should not be playing that way. Seriously, if traps have roles perhaps the videos that explain them and their tool tips should explain the role the balance team intends for them.

    Same with the power generator;  what is the "intended role"?  I thought it was to generate more coin later at the expense of killing now.  It was doing that.  It is still doing that, though much less well.  How has the intended role changed? How is "the ability to sell the Power Generator for full value eliminates the early-late game trade-off that the trap was designed to create" true?  It's less early trap for more later coin.  Just now a lot less useful later on, and hence a lot less attractive early on. 

    The biggest barrier to using more traps ... as indicated by the comments on the mana and health "trap-buffers" is the limit on the number of slots that can be taken.  It's not a big deal *only if* you are on a well coordinated team in which case there are 27 instead of 7.  But only if the team knows each other well enough to trust not taking "essential traps".  A better way -- by far -- to fix the "undervalued trap" problem is to increase substantially the number of traps that a player can slot.  From a balance perspective there is no reason whatsoever not to allow as much as the UI can possibly handle.  If all traps are balanced having more kinds can't possibly imbalance things.  Conversely, if there are more possibilities, then there will be more creativity ... even with traps that are sub-optimal.
    We've discussed all of these perspectives quite significantly.  Before I give my perspective, understand that your perspective is not wrong.  However, at the end of the day, the design team has to make difficult decisions.  It is very difficult to please everyone.

    Players hate having things nerfed; it feels like the game de-values the time they spent grinding and learning.  However, if we only buff under-used items, then player power will only inflate over time.  This is a problem, because it means the game will eventually stop being challenging.  

    So why do we feel the need to make balance changes (and nerfs)?  Replayability in a tower defense comes from diversity in strategies.  All of the traps do have intended strengths and weaknesses, but they are not necessarily explicit.  We hope the player notices that spike traps have trouble hitting runners, brimstone/firecrackers are good at catching runners, tar is good at preventing traps from missing, physics are good against small minions, etc.

    The more a player feels like there is only a "single right answer" or a "universal strategy", the less replayability will exist and the faster players typically get bored.  Furthermore, it reduces the need to have many traps for different situations.

    So why not increase the number of slots?  We actually believe this has the opposite of the perceived effect.  Choices are more interesting when you cannot use every trap you want.  When you can take every trap you might want to use, there's no incentive to re-evaluate and change your build from game to game.

    Anyhow, I hear you.  Hopefully you will find the changes make the game more enjoyable overall, after you have had a chance to experiment with new strategies.

    With the trigger buffs and guardian changes, I firmly believe that player power was overall buffed.
  • Re: Release 2.6 for PC and PS4 - Patch Notes

    Harmonia said:

    Maximillian:

    • Can now place Decoys for free, instead of receiving a 25% bonus to their health.
      Developer Comment: Similar to the Deadeye trap affiliation, we wanted to give Max a little more incentive to use this under-valued trap.

    I don't get it. You're trying to give Max a little more incentive to use his decoy by removing the best incentive there was to use the decoy with him. It's a limited use trap. You can only place 10. That's it. Their value is tied to how long you can make 10 decoys last in a match because it's the only trap that becomes a complete waste of a loadout slot once you go through them. Making them free for him at the cost of the bonus health does not help. I mean, they only cost 255 for him. If bonus health wasn't enough incentive to bring them as Max I don't know why you'd bring them after that change. Less health and free so you can run out of them faster.

    I guess you can at least put down all 10 at the start of the match for the lulz. That's incentive right there.
    +1 to this.

    All the more reason to ignore this trap. Removing the trap count limit is the only way to make the decoy justifiable for that one trap slot.
    Harmonia said:

    Maximillian:

    • Can now place Decoys for free, instead of receiving a 25% bonus to their health.
      Developer Comment: Similar to the Deadeye trap affiliation, we wanted to give Max a little more incentive to use this under-valued trap.

    I don't get it. You're trying to give Max a little more incentive to use his decoy by removing the best incentive there was to use the decoy with him. It's a limited use trap. You can only place 10. That's it. Their value is tied to how long you can make 10 decoys last in a match because it's the only trap that becomes a complete waste of a loadout slot once you go through them. Making them free for him at the cost of the bonus health does not help. I mean, they only cost 255 for him. If bonus health wasn't enough incentive to bring them as Max I don't know why you'd bring them after that change. Less health and free so you can run out of them faster.

    I guess you can at least put down all 10 at the start of the match for the lulz. That's incentive right there.
    +1 to this.

    All the more reason to ignore this trap. Removing the trap count limit is the only way to make the decoy justifiable for that one trap slot.
    Honestly, I think free decoys are overpowered, but decide for yourself.
  • Re: About Chaos Trials difficulty

    That's correct.  Tier 7 peaks at the highest loss rate, although only slightly above tier 6 and 8.

    Tiers 11 and 12 have about 3% success rate, which is about what we want.  Obviously, level 100 players have a higher success rate.

    Keep in mind, Chaos Trials are supposed to scale to the point in which a challenge can ALWAYS exist.  We don't want people to be able to outlevel the challenge of Chaos Trials.  If you prefer easier trials, we offer that option via lower challenge level keys.
  • Re: Water Gardens Master 10minutes????

    Thanks for the feedback.  We will be adjusting the par time in a future patch.